Snapshots - #4

TV shows...

The Casual Vacancy (♦♦♦♦): the death of an idealistic and quite popular councilman in the village of Pagford, England, sets in motion a strange chain of events, for the fate of Sweethouse Estate--a property used for the rehabilitation of local drug addicts--is at stake. Upon the death of councilman Barry Freebrother, three more men, including his up-to-no-good half-brother, vie for the council position and the opportunity to be the deciding vote in the future of the community.

This HBO/BBC miniseries is an adaptation of J.K. Rowling's novel The Casual Vacancy. I can't say whether it is faithful or not to the source material because I haven't read the novel yet, but I liked this miniseries a great deal and found myself quite invested in the characters. Typical British dramas are usually about class differences, but this community focuses on common people with real problems, and that is a welcomed departure from British literary tradition.

The Casual Vacancy is well made, with excellent photography and superb ensemble cast. What surprised me, though, is that it ended on a sad note; I wasn't expecting that at all.

War and Peace (♦♦♦♦♦): The first impression I got from the first episode of this co-production between Weinstein Co. and BBC, an adaptation of the eponymous novel by Leo Tolstoy, is that it was too British to be Russian, but then I watched the next five episodes back to back and by the time I reached the Tsar's Ball and the blooming romance between Natasha Rostova (Lily James) and Prince Andrei Bolkonsky (James Norton), I was hooked.

Being a 19th century novel, it is all about suffering and the human condition. Being mostly about the young nobility, it is mostly about idealism, particularly exemplified in the character of Count Pierre Bezhukov (Paul Dano). There is also love, lust, betrayal, and death—a lot of it, due to the Napoleonic Wars. What emerges throughout is a vivid tapestry of the Russian people defying insurmountable odds, and their wills to survive despite so much suffering.

Beautiful locations, costumes, and excellent performances make this miniseries a must watch.

And now the movies...

Eye in the Sky (♦♦♦♦♦): A joint operation between Kenyan, American, and British military in Kenya, is supposed to capture several most wanted radicals in East Africa meeting in a house, according to human intelligence. Two of them are British citizens, one carries an American passport. But when a drone detects the presence of suicide vests and explosives in the house—suggesting an imminent suicide attack—the mission changes to "must kill". However, a nine year-old girl selling bread in the street, outside the compound, stands in the way of the drone pilot carrying out the order.

Eye in the Sky is a taut military thriller about the complexities—moral, political, and legal, of collateral damage—in modern warfare.

Nuanced performances and great case in point make this thriller a must see.

Favorite quote:
General Benson: "Never tell a soldier that he does not know the cost of war."

The Giver (♦♦♦): In a utopian society in which sameness has been attained by weeding out uniqueness, a young man is tasked with being the “Receiver of Memories”. Only when he meets "the Giver", the man who is to pass on the memories to him, he experiences the wonders of bygone humanity and the world as it once was.

The Giver is an adaptation of the eponymous worldwide phenomenon by Lois Lowry. If you ask me, the movie is quite mediocre, except in those moments that convey what it means to be human, and the wonders of the natural world surrounding us.

I thought the concept of sameness was intriguing but poorly executed. This may be one of those instances in which the book is way better than the movie.

Comments

  1. That's quite a diverse collection. I'm not sure how I missed The Casual Vacancy. I may have to watch it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It sure is diverse. Please let me know how you like The Casual Vacancy.

      Delete
  2. Pleased to hear you also enjoyed The Casual Vacancy and War and Peace - although it seems a little wrong to say 'enjoyed' about The Casual Vacancy as it was so sad at the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, but I use the word "enjoy" like it was entertainment in general, not about the ending in particularly.

      Delete
  3. Yes Eye in the Sky was riveting. I will look for both TV shows you mention thanks! They both sound good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, both miniseries were excellent. Eye in the Sky is my favorite movie of the year thus far.

      Delete
  4. I thought The Casual Vacancy one of the best adapted-for-TV series I have seen. It captured the book so well and my husband, who hadn't read it, got it totally. Looking forward to Eye in the Sky. Last night we watched Ex Machina; I fell asleep twice! Uh oh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with The Casual Vacancy. Eye in the Sky is sooo good...I hope you like it. I liked Ex Machina; I thought it was good, not great.

      Delete
  5. I didn't realise that the Rowling book have been made into a series! Wow, that was quick. I've not seen any of your adaptations this week although I do really fancy War and Peace so very encouraged that you enjoyed it so much.
    Lynn :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Casual Vacancy is only three episodes long, and boy it is sad! I think you would like War and Peace; I loved it! Let me know if you watch it and how you like it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Kindly leave your comments and suggestions.

Popular posts from this blog

El Reino de Este Mundo by Alejo Carpentier (♦♦♦♦)

After Acts by Bryan Litfin (♦♦♦♦♦)

About Time (♦♦♦♦)