Snapshots - #43: Peter Rabbit, A Wrinkle in Time, Annihilation

Peter Rabbit (2018), (♦♦♦♦♦): Peter Rabbit (James Corden) uses his sisters and cousin as decoys against old McGregor every time he intrudes in the old man’s garden to steal vegetables. When McGregor dies of a heart attack, Peter Rabbit and all the neighbor animals rejoice, thinking that their worst days are over. From now on, the garden and the house manor will be theirs to hang in. Little do they know that a younger McGregor (Domhnall Gleeson) has inherited the manor and, when it comes to getting rid of country animals, he means business.
Directed and produced in part by Will Gluck (Easy A (2010) and Friends with Benefits (2011)), Peter Rabbit is a hysterical and delightfully animated tale based on Beatrix Potter’s cast of characters to whom a star-studded actors ensemble lend their voices to achieve one of the most accomplished comedic successes in animated format, or any other format for that matter, to see the light in a long, long time.

The film is light yet edgy, and never forgets that its target audience is kids, though it will most assuredly appeal to adults as well due to the intrinsic love triangle at its heart between Peter Rabbit (James Corden), Bea (Rose Byrne), and Thomas McGregor (Domhnall Gleeson)—Peter Rabbit and McGregor fight with all they’ve got for their right to keep Bea in their lives (among other things).
It is sobering to be reminded that comedy can be simple without being simplistic, and hysterical without the raunchiness that has permeated the genre. Peter Rabbit is a testament that tasteful humor has universal appeal. However, it is a pity that it takes an animated tale to remind us of that fact.
A Wrinkle in Time (2018), (♦♦♦): On the fourth anniversary of the disappearance of NASA scientist Dr. Alex Murry (Chris Pine)—who discovered a way to travel through the universe using wrinkles in the space-time fabric, dubbed tessering— three light beings manifest to his kids, Meg and Charles Wallace, with the intention of tessering to the part of the universe where Dr. Murry may be. Easier said than done, however, for Dr. Murry is trapped in a planet called Camazotz, home to a purely evil energy called IT, which threatens to consume the universe if light and hope is not restored.

This Disney adaptation of Madeleine L’Engle novel of the same title is directed by Ava DuVernay, runs for 109 minutes, and star Storm Reid (Meg), Levi Miller (Calvin), Deric McCabe (Charles Wallace), Gugu Mbatha-Raw (Meg’s mom), Chris Pine (Dr. Alex Murry), Reese Witherspoon (Mrs. Whatsit), Oprah Winfrey (Mrs. Which), and Mindy Kaling (Mrs. Who).
This Sci-fi/fantasy adventure is visually beautiful and wildly imaginative. These elements are evident in the lavish costume designs and makeup, the stunning sets and locations, and the big budget special effects. Also, in that they were able to attract artists of the caliber of Sade, Sia, DJ Khaled and Demi Lovato to perform the soundtrack songs, as well as another four bona fide stars—Chris Pine, Reese Witherspoon, Mindy Kaling, and none other than Oprah Winfrey, to star in.

However beautiful this production is, it is too New Age-esque for its own good, in other words, it lacks universal appeal. I doubt that young audiences were able to fully grasp the scope of the plot. I liked A Wrinkle in Time just fine but was a little underwhelmed considering my anticipation to watch this film. Technically it checks all the right boxes. The plot, however, needed pizzazz.

Favorite quotes:
[Mrs. Whatsit]: ‘We can’t take any credit for our talents. It’s how we use them that counts.”

[Mrs. Which]: “Do you realize how many events and choices had to occur since the birth of the universe leading to the making of you...just exactly the way you are?”

[Mrs. Which]: “The only thing in the universe that travels faster than light is the darkness.”

[Mrs. Which]: “We’re in search of warriors who can fight the IT. Who can bring hope back.”

Annihilation (2018), (♦♦♦): Three years ago, an extraterrestrial event stroke Blackwater National Park. The phenomenon, of an unknown nature, has been growing ever since. Several army units have gone into the zone, dubbed ‘The Shimmer’, to investigate. Of all those people only one has returned, Sargent Kane (Oscar Isaac), infected by an unknown malady—a plague or a virus of some kind.

Lena (Natalie Portman), Kane’s wife, was also once a soldier. Now, a civilian, she teaches cell biology at John Hopkins. When Kane returns home with hardly any answers, unaware of the time he has been missing, and starts experiencing seizures and bleeding profusely, both, Lena and Kane, are escorted to an undisclosed location: the closest entry point to ‘The Shimmer’. Lena is vetted for a mission and, along with four other ladies, a mix of army hands and two scientists, venture into The Shimmer. What they find confound them. What is the true nature of ‘The Shimmer’ or its purpose?
Directed and adapted for the screen by Alex Garland—known for writing/directing Ex-Machina, and for writing the screenplay of Never Let Me Go)— in Annihilation star Natalie Portman (Lena, Professor of Cell Biology), Oscar Isaac (Sargent Kane, Lena’s husband), Jennifer Jason Leigh (Ventress, Psychologist), Tessa Thompson (Josie Radek, Physicist), Gina Rodriguez (Anya Thorensen, former Paramedic), and Tuva Novotny (Cassie Sheppard, Army).

With beautiful photography, special effects, and eerie, almost jarring music that enhances the sense of dread, Annihilation is a slow-burning, endearing mystery/thriller in an intriguing format. The movie unfolds in a long interview, with Lena, having returned from The Shimmer, answering questions—interspersed with the action scenes—about what happened to the rest of the team and what they saw inside.

The film is divided in three parts and the audience witnesses what happens along with the characters, which makes for a frustrating but satisfying experience. What they found confounded me. I think I got the ending, or at least its highlights, but it seems that the story has a sequel; I hope one is at least in the planning stages.


  1. I went through a Beatrix Potter craze a few years ago, I think when that movie about her life came out. My kids loved having her books read to them and that was more than a few years ago-:)
    I am looking forward to seeing A Wrinkle In Time. I have read the book several times and when you said the movie was "too New Age-esque for its own good" I took that to mean that it must follow the book pretty closely! I will let you know what I think.
    I have also read Annihilation (very strange and even more confusing than the movie). Saw the movie this past week and it made more sense than the book. I liked both and each version made a huge unsettling impact on me.

    1. Peter Rabbit was a lot of fun. I read a review in IMDb saying that key elements of A Wrinkle in Time were poorly portrayed. I wouldn't know, but I rated the movie higher than most reviewers did. I liked it; I just thought that it was too out there for my taste. It is visually stunning though. Annihilation is unsettling, but in the right way. The ending is different than anything I have ever seen.

  2. I had not heard of this animated film version of Peter Rabbit. I loved Beatrix Potter and her characters when I was a child, which now almost seems a part of another lifetime! I'm happy to know that people, especially children, are still enjoying her works.

    1. Welcome back, Dorothy! :-) This version of Peter Rabbit wasn't received as well by the general public as it was by me, but I couldn't stop laughing almost from beginning to end.

  3. Hmm. I wonder if I should see Annihilation? It sounds a bit intriguing but I usually don't like confusing endings hmm. I don't have an interest in seeing A Wrinkle in Time, it just looks too out there for me or as you say : New Age-y. I did enjoy the book not too long ago. And that I will stick with.

    1. I do recommend Annihilation. The ending is different for sure, but the movie is intriguing. If you liked the book A Wrinkle in Time, the movie can go either way for you; either you like it or you don't. It has received poor ratings in general, mine is actually higher than the movie received on IMDb. I watched it again two days ago and I liked it again. It holds well on second viewing. It is visually beautiful, and if you like movies just for that aspect you will enjoy it; however, as I said, it is just too out there plot-wise.


Post a Comment

Please leave your comments and/or suggestions.